ECC Research Atlas Dashboard

Atlas document

Source: 03_papers/sustainable_ecc_extension/choi-2022-highly-ductile-behavior-and-sustainability_paper_card.md open raw

Choi et al. (2022) — Highly Ductile Behavior and Sustainability of Engineered Cementitious Composites Reinforced by PE Based Selvage Fibers

Citation

Choi, J.-I., Park, S.-E., Kim, Y., Yang, K., Kim, Y. Y., & Lee, B. Y. (2022). Highly ductile behavior and sustainability of engineered cementitious composites reinforced by PE based selvage fibers. Cement and Concrete Composites, 134, 104729.

Why this paper matters

Solves the primary economic and carbon barrier of high-strength PE-ECC (where virgin UHMWPE fibers account for > 80 % of material cost) by successfully upcycling industrial textile waste—discarded UHMWPE selvages from protective glove manufacturing—into high-performance short fibers, achieving tensile ductility $> 5.6\%$ and reducing fiber cost by ~60 %.

Main contribution

Evidence summary

Linked Atlas nodes

Relationship to Victor Li book

Claim-evidence rows to add

Atlas node Claim Evidence summary Page/Figure/Table Status
04_material_systems/pe_ecc.md De-twisted UHMWPE selvage waste fibers (Type S3) achieve direct tensile strain capacity of 5.65 % and tensile strength of 10.42 MPa Uniaxial tensile tests on S3-ECC specimens showed saturated multiple micro-cracking with $\epsilon_u = 5.65\%$ Section 3.2, Fig. 5 & 6, Table 3 verified_from_pdf
02_concepts/circular_economy_materials.md Upcycling PE fabric selvage waste reduces composite material cost by 58 % and embodied energy by 42 % compared to virgin PE-ECC LCA and cost modeling quantified significant reductions in environmental burden and raw material expenditure Section 3.3, Fig. 8-10, Table 4 verified_from_pdf
02_concepts/strain_hardening_criteria.md Fibrillation and individual filament separation are required to ensure high fiber count and steady-state flat cracking in selvage-reinforced ECC S3 (monofilament) achieved $\epsilon_u = 5.65\%$ compared to S1 (bundles, $\epsilon_u = 1.45\%$) due to uniform bridging distribution Section 3.2 & 4, Fig. 7 verified_from_pdf

Verification status

Cautions