ECC Research Atlas Dashboard

Atlas document

Source: 09_ai_workflows/atlas_query_templates.md open raw

Atlas Query Templates

Status

General answer protocol

  1. Identify query type.
  2. Retrieve from the recommended targets in order.
  3. Use concept nodes for structure and claim-evidence rows for factual/numeric claims.
  4. Cite paths explicitly.
  5. If evidence is pending original PDF verification, say so.
  6. Do not invent page numbers, metrics, DOI values, or paper relationships.

1. Concept explanation

User question pattern

What is <concept>?
<concept>가 뭐야?
Explain <concept> simply.
학생에게 <concept>를 설명해줘.

Example:

PE/UHMWPE fiber가 extreme ductility에 유리한 이유는?

Retrieval targets

  1. 08_teaching/concept_explainers/
  2. relevant 02_concepts/*.md
  3. relevant 04_material_systems/*.md
  4. 07_visualization/*claim_evidence_matrix.csv
  5. representative paper cards under 03_papers/

For PE/UHMWPE and extreme ductility:

Required evidence fields

Response format

Short answer
Intuitive explanation
Technical explanation
Evidence
Caution / common misunderstanding
Sources

Example answer skeleton

Short answer: PE/UHMWPE fibers are favorable for extreme ductility because they can provide strong but pullout-tolerant crack bridging, allowing many cracks to form before localization.

Intuitively, they act like many fine bridges across cracks. If the fibers pull out gradually rather than rupture abruptly, the composite can keep forming new cracks.

Technically, this supports PSH by maintaining bridging stress and complementary energy over crack opening. Fine fiber diameter also improves bridging-fiber number density, reducing weak-section variability.

Evidence: <cite Chen 2026 / Ding 2018 / Yu 2018 row from `extreme_ductility_extension_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`>.

Caution: high tensile strength alone is not enough; interface, diameter, dispersion, and matrix toughness must also be compatible.

2. Literature lineage

User question pattern

How did <topic> develop?
<topic> 연구 계보를 정리해줘.
<material/system>의 literature lineage를 보여줘.

Example:

Lee lab의 cementless EGC 연구는 global literature에서 어디에 위치하는가?

Retrieval targets

For general lineage:

  1. index.md
  2. relevant synthesis node, e.g. 02_concepts/extreme_ductility_ecc.md or 04_material_systems/green_ecc.md
  3. 07_visualization/graph_concept_to_concept_edges.csv
  4. topic-specific claim-evidence matrix
  5. paper cards

For Lee lab lineage:

  1. 06_lab_position/our_lab_position_map.md
  2. 07_visualization/lab_to_global_lineage_map.md
  3. relevant positioning card under 06_lab_position/
  4. 07_visualization/graph_lab_to_global_edges.csv
  5. 07_visualization/by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv

Required evidence fields

Response format

Lineage summary
Timeline or staged list
Key mechanism shift at each stage
Lee lab position, if relevant
Evidence table

Example answer skeleton

The cementless EGC lineage can be framed as:

1. Global ECC micromechanics: PSH and fiber bridging define the design logic.
2. Green ECC transition: binder replacement becomes meaningful only if strain-hardening and crack-width control remain.
3. AAS/EGC branch: cementless slag and fly ash/geopolymer matrices are adapted to satisfy PSH.
4. Lee lab position: Lee 2012 establishes AAS feasibility; Choi 2016 and later studies extend PE/AAS and EGC systems toward ultra-ductility and sustainability.

Sources: `06_lab_position/alkali_activated_ultra_ductile_position.md`; `04_material_systems/green_ecc.md`; `07_visualization/by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`.

3. Compare material systems

User question pattern

Compare <system A> and <system B>.
<system A>와 <system B> 차이를 정리해줘.
Which is better for <goal>: <system A> or <system B>?

Example:

AAS-ECC와 geopolymer EGC를 비교해줘.

Retrieval targets

  1. relevant 04_material_systems/*.md
  2. 07_visualization/*claim_evidence_matrix.csv, filtered by material_system
  3. 06_lab_position/ if Lee lab relevance is requested
  4. representative paper cards

Required evidence fields

Response format

Comparison table
Mechanism differences
Performance differences
Sustainability/durability implications
Use-case recommendation
Cited evidence

Example answer skeleton

| Aspect | AAS-ECC | Geopolymer EGC |
|---|---|---|
| Binder | alkali-activated slag | fly ash/slag/metakaolin geopolymer |
| Design issue | activator, rheology, interface | activator chemistry, curing, reaction products |
| Key performance | <metric from evidence row> | <metric from evidence row> |

Interpretation: both are cementless/low-carbon routes, but they differ in reaction chemistry and curing sensitivity.

Sources: `04_material_systems/green_ecc.md`; `04_material_systems/geopolymer_ecc.md`; relevant rows in `sustainable_ecc_extension_claim_evidence_matrix.csv` and `by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`.

4. Find evidence for a claim

User question pattern

Find evidence for <claim>.
<claim>을 뒷받침하는 논문/근거 찾아줘.
이 주장에 대한 source-grounded evidence를 정리해줘.

Example:

self-healing ECC에서 fiber bridging과 crack-width control의 역할은?

Retrieval targets

  1. claim-evidence matrices first: - 07_visualization/foundational_papers_claim_evidence_matrix.csv - 07_visualization/extreme_ductility_extension_claim_evidence_matrix.csv - 07_visualization/sustainable_ecc_extension_claim_evidence_matrix.csv - 07_visualization/by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv
  2. relevant concept/material nodes
  3. source notes for the selected rows
  4. paper cards for citation summary

Required evidence fields

Response format

Claim restatement
Evidence table
Synthesis paragraph
Verification caveat

Example answer skeleton

Claim: In self-healing ECC, crack-width control and fiber bridging provide the physical conditions for reliable healing.

| Evidence | Source | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber content governs permeability reduction... | `by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`, paper_id=`alemu_2023...` | verified_from_pdf / source-note status |
| Hybrid PE-PVA expands complete healing threshold... | `by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`, paper_id=`choi_2021...` | verified_from_pdf / source-note status |

Synthesis: The evidence suggests that healing is not only a chemical-additive problem. ECC microcracking and fiber bridging reduce flow and create sites for healing products.

5. Draft manuscript introduction

User question pattern

Draft an introduction for <topic>.
<topic> 논문 introduction 초안 써줘.
<topic> 배경과 novelty를 논문용으로 정리해줘.

Example:

recycled selvage fiber ECC의 novelty는 무엇인가?

Retrieval targets

  1. relevant 06_lab_position/*_position.md
  2. 07_visualization/lab_to_global_lineage_map.md
  3. relevant material-system / concept node
  4. claim-evidence matrix rows with priority_for_synthesis = high
  5. paper cards for representative citations

Required evidence fields

Response format

Paragraph 1: broad problem
Paragraph 2: global literature status
Paragraph 3: gap / limitation
Paragraph 4: current study novelty
Evidence notes / citation placeholders

Example answer skeleton

Paragraph 1: ECC provides tensile ductility and crack-width control, but broad deployment is limited by fiber cost and embodied energy.

Paragraph 2: Prior Green ECC research uses SCMs, geopolymer binders, and recycled polymer fibers, but many recycled-fiber systems suffer performance loss.

Paragraph 3: The Lee lab selvage-fiber lineage shows that high-performance PE textile waste can retain bridging capacity when processed and dispersed properly.

Paragraph 4: Therefore, the current study is positioned as a circular-economy ECC route that preserves strain-hardening while reducing reliance on virgin fibers.

Sources: `06_lab_position/recycled_selvage_fiber_position.md`; `04_material_systems/green_ecc.md`; relevant rows in `by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`.

6. Draft discussion paragraph

User question pattern

Draft a discussion paragraph for <result>.
<result>를 literature와 연결해서 discussion 문단 써줘.

Example:

low-fiber EGC에서 EPS flaw design 결과를 discussion으로 연결해줘.

Retrieval targets

  1. relevant lab positioning card
  2. relevant concept node, especially mechanism nodes
  3. claim-evidence matrix rows for comparable metrics
  4. representative paper cards

Required evidence fields

Response format

Interpretation of current result
Connection to mechanism
Comparison to prior evidence
Limitation / caution
Forward-looking implication

Example answer skeleton

The result can be interpreted through flaw-design logic rather than as a simple strength reduction. In the ECC micromechanics framework, intentional flaws can help activate distributed cracking by lowering the local cracking threshold, provided that fiber bridging remains sufficient. This aligns with the Atlas flaw-design lineage and the Lee lab low-fiber EGC positioning. However, the claim should remain framed as `manuscript / draft` until the specific low-fiber EGC source files are ingested and verified.

Sources: `06_lab_position/low_fiber_egc_position.md`; `02_concepts/flaw_design.md`; `03_papers/wang_li_2004_tailoring_preexisting_flaws.md`.

7. Reviewer response support

User question pattern

Help respond to reviewer comment: <comment>
리뷰어 코멘트에 대응할 근거 찾아줘.
Reviewer says <claim>; how should we respond?

Retrieval targets

  1. claim-evidence matrix rows for factual rebuttal
  2. relevant source notes and paper cards
  3. lab positioning notes if novelty or contribution is challenged
  4. concept nodes for mechanism explanation

Required evidence fields

Response format

Reviewer concern
Evidence available in Atlas
Recommended response logic
Suggested response paragraph
Caution / what not to overclaim

Example answer skeleton

Reviewer concern: The reviewer questions whether recycled selvage fibers can maintain ECC tensile performance.

Evidence: Choi 2022 and Hwang 2025 rows in `by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv` support tensile ductility and pullout behavior of selvage fiber systems.

Suggested response: We agree that recycled fibers often reduce performance; however, the present system uses PE-based selvage fibers, whose filament properties and pullout behavior differ from generic recycled polymer fibers...

Caution: Avoid saying all recycled fibers are suitable for ECC.

8. Proposal background

User question pattern

Draft proposal background for <topic>.
<topic> 연구재단 제안서 배경 써줘.

Example:

Wiki-RAG 기반 재료 배합 최적화 제안서 배경 써줘.

Retrieval targets

  1. 06_lab_position/materials_ai_wikirag_position.md
  2. 09_ai_workflows/wiki_rag_ingestion_plan.md
  3. relevant lab positioning cards
  4. 04_material_systems/green_ecc.md
  5. claim-evidence matrices for examples

Required evidence fields

Response format

Problem
Need
Prior basis
Lee lab readiness
Proposed direction
Expected impact
Evidence notes

Example answer skeleton

Problem: ECC/EGC mixture design involves coupled binder, fiber, flaw, curing, and durability variables.
Need: Physical AI is premature without structured evidence and experiment data.
Prior basis: The Atlas already contains source-grounded matrices and lab-positioning maps.
Lee lab readiness: The lab corpus spans AAS/EGC, recycled fibers, self-healing, flaw design, and performance testing.
Proposed direction: Build a Wiki-RAG material design infrastructure that retrieves verified evidence and generates candidate mixture hypotheses for experimental validation.

Sources: `06_lab_position/materials_ai_wikirag_position.md`; `09_ai_workflows/wiki_rag_ingestion_plan.md`.

9. Teaching module generation

User question pattern

Generate a lecture module for <topic>.
학생용으로 <topic> 강의 모듈 만들어줘.
<topic> 개념 설명문 만들어줘.

Retrieval targets

  1. 08_teaching/lecture_modules/
  2. 08_teaching/concept_explainers/
  3. relevant concept node
  4. claim-evidence matrix rows for representative evidence
  5. paper cards for suggested reading

Required evidence fields

Response format

Learning objectives
Key concepts
Minimal theory
Evidence
Representative papers
Discussion questions
Assignment idea
Linked nodes

Example answer skeleton

# Lecture Module: Fiber Bridging

Learning objectives:
- Explain fiber bridging after matrix cracking.
- Interpret pullout vs rupture.

Evidence:
- `02_concepts/fiber_bridging_law.md`
- `05_experiments/single_fiber_pullout.md`
- `07_visualization/foundational_papers_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`

10. Lab positioning query

User question pattern

Where does Lee lab's <topic> research sit in the global literature?
Lee lab의 <topic> 연구 positioning 정리해줘.
교수님 연구의 novelty claim을 만들어줘.

Examples:

Lee lab의 cementless EGC 연구는 global literature에서 어디에 위치하는가?
recycled selvage fiber ECC의 novelty는 무엇인가?
low-fiber EGC / EPS flaw design의 전략적 위치는?

Retrieval targets

Always retrieve from 06_lab_position/ first:

  1. 06_lab_position/our_lab_position_map.md
  2. relevant positioning card: - 06_lab_position/alkali_activated_ultra_ductile_position.md - 06_lab_position/recycled_selvage_fiber_position.md - 06_lab_position/self_healing_position.md - 06_lab_position/low_fiber_egc_position.md - 06_lab_position/materials_ai_wikirag_position.md
  3. 07_visualization/lab_to_global_lineage_map.md
  4. 07_visualization/graph_lab_to_global_edges.csv
  5. 07_visualization/by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv
  6. relevant global Atlas nodes

Required evidence fields

Response format

Positioning sentence
Global anchor
Lee lab contribution
Representative papers and evidence
Strategic novelty claim
Cautions
Reusable manuscript/proposal sentence
Sources

Example answer skeleton

Positioning sentence: Lee lab's cementless EGC research is positioned as a sustained transfer of ECC micromechanics into alkali-activated and geopolymer binder systems while preserving tensile strain-hardening and crack control.

Global anchor: Victor Li micromechanics and PSH criteria.

Lee lab contribution: Lee 2012 establishes AAS strain-hardening feasibility; subsequent PE-AAS and fly ash/geopolymer EGC studies extend the route toward high ductility, sustainability, and self-healing.

Strategic novelty claim: The lab's contribution is not binder substitution alone, but micromechanical adaptation of cementless binders to retain ECC functions.

Sources: `06_lab_position/alkali_activated_ultra_ductile_position.md`; `07_visualization/by_lee_lab_publications_claim_evidence_matrix.csv`; `04_material_systems/green_ecc.md`.