ECC Research Atlas Dashboard

Atlas document

Source: 03_papers/by_lee_lab_publications/park-2025-length-effects-of-pe-based-selvage_paper_card.md open raw

Park et al. (2025) — Length Effects of Recycled PE Selvage Fibers in Engineered Cementitious Composites

Citation

Se-Eon Park, Huy Hoàng Nguyễn, Yun Yong Kim, Youngsang Kim, Bang Yeon Lee (2025). Length effects of PE-based selvage fibers on fresh, fiber dispersion, and tensile properties of engineered cementitious composites. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 14(2), 327–337.

Why this paper matters

Systematically evaluates the influence of recycled PE-based selvage fiber length (5, 10, and 15 mm at 1.75 vol. %) on fresh flowability, SEM/EDS carbon-mapped fiber dispersion ($\alpha_f \approx 0.40$), and direct tensile performance of ECC. Proves that 15 mm fibers (F-15) achieve a compressive strength of $61.5\text{ MPa}$, a tensile strength of $8.04\text{ MPa}$, and a tensile strain capacity of $7.24 \pm 0.39\text{ \%}$ (71.5 cracks, $l_s = 1.12\text{ mm}$, $w_c = 80.0\ \mu\text{m}$, and back-calculated $\tau_0 = 1.132\text{ MPa}$), while even 5 mm short fibers (F-5) sustain $5.13\text{ \%}$ ductility (double standard M45 ECC).

Main contribution

Evidence summary

Linked Atlas nodes

Relationship to Victor Li book

Claim-evidence rows to add

Atlas node Claim Evidence summary Page/Figure/Table Status
04_material_systems/green_ecc.md 15 mm recycled selvage fiber ECC (F-15) achieves 61.5 MPa compressive strength and 7.24 % direct tensile strain capacity with $80\ \mu\text{m}$ crack width Uniaxial direct tension and compression tests verified $f_c = 61.5\text{ MPa}$ and $\epsilon_{ts} = 7.24\text{ \%}$ Page 327:1 & 335 / Table 5, 6, 8 / Fig. 10c verified_from_pdf
04_material_systems/green_ecc.md Even 5 mm ultra-short selvage fibers (F-5) sustain 5.13 % tensile strain capacity, outperforming standard M45 ECC Direct tensile tests verified $\epsilon_{ts} = 5.13\text{ \%}$ for 5 mm fibers Page 333 / Table 6 / Fig. 10a, 13 verified_from_pdf
05_experiments/crack_width_distribution.md Theoretical crack spacing model matches experimental spacing (1.12–1.61 mm) with back-calculated interfacial bond $\tau_0 = 1.132\text{ MPa}$ within 5.3 % error Crack spacing modeling verified $\tau_0 = 1.132\text{ MPa}$ with max error 5.3 % Page 334 / Table 8 / Eq. (3)–(4) verified_from_pdf

Verification status

Cautions