ECC Research Atlas Dashboard

Atlas document

Source: 03_papers/sustainable_ecc_extension/artyk-2024-development-of-engineered-geopolymer-composites-containing_paper_card.md open raw

Artyk et al. (2024) — Development of Engineered Geopolymer Composites Containing Low-Activity Fly Ashes and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slags with Hybrid Fibers

Citation

Artyk, Z., Kuan, Y., Zhang, D., Shon, C.-S., Ogwumeh, C. M., & Kim, J. (2024). Development of engineered geopolymer composites containing low-activity fly ashes and ground granulated blast furnace slags with hybrid fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 422, 135760.

Why this paper matters

Demonstrates that low-grade, non-ASTM compliant coal fly ash (stockpiled in massive quantities in Central Asia) can be successfully blended 50/50 with GGBFS and alkali activators to produce ductile Engineered Geopolymer Composites (EGC). Integrates PVA, PP, and steel hybrid fibers to achieve $\epsilon_u > 2\%$ while providing thermal insulation ($k < 0.25\text{ W/m}\cdot\text{K}$) for masonry retrofitting.

Main contribution

Evidence summary

Linked Atlas nodes

Relationship to Victor Li book

Claim-evidence rows to add

Atlas node Claim Evidence summary Page/Figure/Table Status
04_material_systems/engineered_geopolymer_composites.md Low-activity fly ash blended with GGBFS (50:50) forms an alkali-activated matrix capable of pseudo strain-hardening 28d compressive strength reached 23–32 MPa and tensile strain capacity exceeded 2.0 % with PVA/PP fibers Section 3.1 & 3.3, Fig. 5-7, Table 6 verified_from_pdf
04_material_systems/hybrid_fiber_ecc.md Hybridizing 1.5 vol. % PVA with 0.5 vol. % PP maintains tensile strain capacity > 2.0 % while reducing composite cost Uniaxial tensile strain capacity reached $2.15\%$ with multi-cracking behavior Section 3.3, Fig. 7, Table 6 verified_from_pdf
04_material_systems/industrial_waste_streams.md Zero-cement EGC exhibits low thermal conductivity (< 0.25 W/m·K), facilitating energy-efficient retrofitting Measured thermal conductivity was 0.21–0.24 W/m·K across all EGC formulations Section 3.4, Fig. 8 verified_from_pdf

Verification status

Cautions