Nguyễn et al. (2023) — Activator Pretreatment Micromechanics of 18.6 % Ductile Geopolymer Composite
Citation
Huy Hoàng Nguyễn, Quang-Hiếu Lương, Phương Hoàng Nguyễn, Hyeong-Ki Kim, Youngsang Kim, Bang Yeon Lee (2023). Micromechanical and mineralogy analyses on extremely ductile engineered geopolymer composites with different activator pretreatments. Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 108093.
- DOI:
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108093 - Atlas layer: extension
- Related Victor Li book chapter: Chapter 4: Micromechanics-Based Material Design & Chapter 9: Green ECC
- Source PDF:
primary_data/nguyen-2023-micromechanical-and-mineralogy-analyses-on.pdfIJP07723E_Micromechanical and mineralogy_JBE.pdf` - Extracted text:
secondary_data/full_texts/nguyen-2023-micromechanical-and-mineralogy-analyses-on_full_text.mdsecondary_data/full_texts/IJP07723E_Micromechanical and mineralogy_JBE_full_text.md` - Source note:
secondary_data/source_notes/nguyen-2023-micromechanical-and-mineralogy-analyses-on_source_note.mdsecondary_data/source_notes/IJP07723E_Micromechanical and mineralogy_JBE_source_note.md`
Why this paper matters
Discovers an activator pretreatment conditioning mechanism in fly ash-based geopolymer composites (ED-EGC, 1.75 vol. % PE fiber). Cooling pretreatment (CP, 24 h at 23 °C) lowers matrix fracture toughness ($K_m = 0.06\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m}^{1/2}$) and crack tip toughness ($J_{tip} = 0.62\text{ J/m}^2$) to achieve an unprecedented $18.62 \pm 1.59\text{ \%}$ direct tensile strain capacity with an energy performance index ($PSHE = 817.2$) 303 times higher than the design threshold, surpassing the ductility of structural steel rebars.
Main contribution
- Record 18.6 % Direct Tensile Strain Capacity: Cooling pretreated composite (
ED-EGC-CP) achieved $\epsilon_{sc} = \mathbf{18.62 \pm 1.59\text{ \%}}$, $f_{ts} = 5.54\text{ MPa}$, and $f_c = 20.7\text{ MPa}$ ($\rho = 1.46\text{ g/cm}^3$). - Activator Pretreatment Conditioning: Proved warming pretreatment (
WP, 50 °C for 5 min) yields dense N-A-S-H with higher strength ($f_c = 31.1\text{ MPa}, f_{ts} = 8.72\text{ MPa}, \epsilon_{sc} = 10.97\text{ \%}$), while cooling pretreatment (CP, 23 °C for 24 h) prioritizes extreme ductility. - PSH Micromechanical Validation: Single crack and notched beam tests confirmed $J_{tip} = 0.62\text{ J/m}^2$ and $J_b' = 57.52\text{ J/m}^2$, driving $PSHE = \mathbf{817.2}$ (CP) and $PSHE = \mathbf{452.4}$ (WP), with EDS identifying N-A-S-H gel as the governing reaction matrix.
Evidence summary
- Density & Compressive Strength:
ED-EGC-WP: $\rho = 1.64\text{ g/cm}^3$, $f_c = 31.1\text{ MPa}$ (Table 1, Fig. 8, Pages 3 & 8).ED-EGC-CP: $\rho = 1.46\text{ g/cm}^3$, $f_c = 20.7\text{ MPa}$ (Structural lightweight).- Direct Uniaxial Tensile Performance:
ED-EGC-CP: $\epsilon_{sc} = \mathbf{18.62 \pm 1.59\text{ \%}}$ (18.6 %), $f_{ts} = 5.54 \pm 0.10\text{ MPa}$, $f_{cs} = 3.40\text{ MPa}$, $U_t = 0.83\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m/m}$, 72.8 cracks ($w_c = 199.3\ \mu\text{m}, s_c = 1.07\text{ mm}$) (Table 4 & Figs. 9–11, Pages 5, 8–10).ED-EGC-WP: $\epsilon_{sc} = 10.97 \pm 1.31\text{ \%}$, $f_{ts} = 8.72 \pm 0.76\text{ MPa}$, $f_{cs} = 4.67\text{ MPa}$, $U_t = 0.73\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m/m}$, 50.0 cracks ($w_c = 171.8\ \mu\text{m}, s_c = 1.57\text{ mm}$).- Micromechanical PSH Metrics:
- Matrix properties: $K_m = 0.06\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m}^{1/2}, J_{tip} = 0.62\text{ J/m}^2$ for CP vs $K_m = 0.11, J_{tip} = 1.25\text{ J/m}^2$ for WP (Table 6, Page 10).
- Performance Indices: $PSHE = \mathbf{817.2}$ for CP vs $\mathbf{452.4}$ for WP; $PSHS = 1.63$ vs $1.87$ (Table 7, Page 10).
- Morphology & Mineralogy:
- Pure fiber pullout failure observed under SEM/BSE (Fig. 12, Page 11).
- EDS elemental mapping and ternary phase diagram confirmed N-A-S-H gel as primary matrix product (Figs. 13–14, Pages 12–13).
Linked Atlas nodes
02_concepts/strain_hardening_criteria.md02_concepts/flaw_design.md04_material_systems/green_ecc.md04_material_systems/lightweight_ecc.md05_experiments/direct_tensile_test.md
Relationship to Victor Li book
- Primary book anchor remains Victor Li (2019), Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC).
- Directly extends Chapter 4 (Micromechanics-Based Material Design) and Chapter 5 (PSH Criteria) by demonstrating that alkali activator thermal conditioning directly tailors matrix fracture toughness ($K_m = 0.06\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m}^{1/2}$), driving $PSHE$ to 817.2 and realizing a record 18.62 % direct tensile strain capacity in a 100 % fly ash geopolymer.
Claim-evidence rows to add
| Atlas node | Claim | Evidence summary | Page/Figure/Table | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
02_concepts/strain_hardening_criteria.md |
Fly ash-based ED-EGC-CP achieves an unprecedented 18.62 % direct tensile strain capacity governed by an energy performance index of $PSHE = 817.2$ | Uniaxial tension and single crack tests confirmed 18.62 % ductility and $PSHE = 817.2$ | Page 108093:1, 9, 10 / Table 4, 7 / Fig. 9b, 11 | verified_from_pdf |
02_concepts/flaw_design.md |
Cooling activator pretreatment reduces matrix fracture toughness to $K_m = 0.06\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m}^{1/2}$ and $J_{tip} = 0.62\text{ J/m}^2$, doubling tensile ductility over warming pretreatment | Fracture toughness tests confirmed $K_m = 0.06\text{ MPa}\cdot\text{m}^{1/2}$ and $J_{tip} = 0.62\text{ J/m}^2$ | Page 108093:10 / Table 6 | verified_from_pdf |
04_material_systems/green_ecc.md |
SEM/EDS chemical mapping identifies N-A-S-H gel as the governing geopolymer product in lightweight 18.6 % ductile EGC | Elemental mapping and ternary phase diagram confirmed N-A-S-H gel | Page 108093:13 / Figs. 12, 13, 14 | verified_from_pdf |
Verification status
- PDF preserved: yes (in
primary_data/IJP07723E_Micromechanical and mineralogy_JBE.pdf) - Text extracted: yes (PyMuPDF, 15 pages)
- DOI verified: yes (
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108093) - Page/figure/table verified: yes (all checked in PDF text)
- Claim-evidence matrix ready: yes
Cautions
- Cooling pretreated mixture requires high SP dosage (0.037) and 5 d initial curing before demolding.
- Compressive strength of CP is modest ($20.7\text{ MPa}$) compared to WP ($31.1\text{ MPa}$).