ECC Research Atlas Dashboard

Atlas document

Source: 09_ai_workflows/claude_concept_foundational_evidence_prompt.md open raw

Claude Task: Add Foundational Evidence Sections to Core Atlas Concept Nodes

You are Claude running through the claude-reviewer Hermes profile. Hermes is the orchestrator and verifier. Work only inside:

/Users/bylee/Documents/Research_Knowledge/ECC_Research_Atlas/

Goal

Use the now-verified 13-paper claim-evidence matrix to add concise, traceable ## Foundational evidence sections to the highest-priority ECC Research Atlas concept / experiment nodes.

This pass should convert the verified paper matrix into human-readable concept-node evidence, while preserving the seed narrative already present in the nodes.

Evidence source of truth

Primary input:

Supporting inputs:

Target nodes

Add or update ## Foundational evidence sections in these 10 files:

  1. 02_concepts/strain_hardening_criteria.md
  2. 02_concepts/fiber_bridging_law.md
  3. 02_concepts/flaw_design.md
  4. 02_concepts/fiber_dispersion.md
  5. 02_concepts/processing_rheology.md
  6. 02_concepts/interface_properties.md
  7. 05_experiments/direct_tensile_test.md
  8. 05_experiments/crack_width_distribution.md
  9. 02_concepts/distributed_microcracking.md
  10. 02_concepts/micromechanics_based_design.md

Do not edit 06_lab_position/ or lab-specific nodes.

Required section format

For each target file, insert or replace one section with this heading:

## Foundational evidence

Inside it, include:

  1. 3-8 bullets, depending on evidence strength.
  2. Each bullet should have: - concise claim; - paper card link in Markdown wiki style or relative path; - status tag from matrix, e.g. [verified_from_full_text] or [verified_from_source_note]; - short evidence note. Keep it concise.
  3. If a node has weak evidence, explicitly say Evidence depth: limited / single-paper within current foundational set.
  4. Avoid long quotations.
  5. Do not invent figure/page/equation numbers.
  6. If the matrix row is verified_from_source_note, use phrase like source-note verified; full-text spot-check pending only if necessary. But do not imply it is ungrounded.
  7. For fiber_bridging_law.md, include both: - Li & Leung 1992 base constant-friction / snubbing model; - Lin & Li 1997 slip-hardening extension; - Yang et al. 2008 two-way debonding / micro-spalling / Cook-Gordon refinement.
  8. For strain_hardening_criteria.md, include both strength criterion and energy criterion, plus Kanda & Li 2006 robust margins 1.3 and 2.7.
  9. For flaw_design.md, include Wang & Li 2004 artificial flaw tailoring, Tosun-Felekoglu 2013 fiber/flaw analysis, Lu et al. 2018 μCT flaw cross-section result.
  10. For fiber_dispersion.md and processing_rheology.md, include Li & Wang 2006, Zhou et al. 2012, Li & Li 2012/2013, Tosun-Felekoglu 2013.

Deliverables

  1. Updated 10 target files.
  2. Create:

07_visualization/concept_foundational_evidence_update_report.md

Report must include:

  1. Create JSON summary:

07_visualization/concept_foundational_evidence_update_summary.json

Include:

Constraints

Verification before finishing

Verify:

  1. All 10 target files contain ## Foundational evidence.
  2. Each section contains at least 3 bullets except if intentionally limited, but still explain evidence depth.
  3. Report exists.
  4. Summary JSON exists and parses.
  5. Protected dirs untouched.

Return concise completion summary.