Kan et al. (2025a) — Engineered Geopolymer Composites for Concrete Repair: Durability Behavior and Mechanistic Investigation Under Sulfate Wet-Dry Cycles
Citation
Kan, L., Chen, B., & Gan, Y. (2025). Engineered geopolymer composites for concrete repair: Durability behavior and mechanistic investigation under sulfate wet-dry cycles. Journal of Building Engineering, 114, 114323.
- DOI:
10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114323 - Atlas layer: core
- Related Victor Li book chapter: Chapter 10: Long-Term Durability (Sulfate Resistance) & Chapter 11: Infrastructure Repair and Structural Retrofitting
- Source PDF:
kan-2025-engineered-geopolymer-composites-for-concrete.pdf - Extracted text:
full_text/kan-2025-engineered-geopolymer-composites-for-concrete_full_text.md - Source note:
source_notes/kan-2025-engineered-geopolymer-composites-for-concrete_source_note.md
Why this paper matters
Pioneers the evaluation of high-ductility PE-reinforced Engineered Geopolymer Composites (PE-EGC, $\epsilon_u \approx 8.0\%$) as an overlay repair material for high-strength concrete under severe 10 % $\text{Na}_2\text{SO}_4$ wet-dry cycles (up to 175 cycles), establishing that coexisting N-A-S-H/C-A-S-H interfacial gels limit bond strength reduction to $< 19\%$ while completely eliminating delamination spalling.
Main contribution
- Develops a high-ductility ternary EGC (GGBS:FA:SF = 44:44:11) reinforced with 1.50 vol. % PE fibers, attaining an ultimate tensile strain capacity of ~8.0 %, tensile strength of 5.49 MPa, and compressive strength of 60.58 MPa.
- Tests EGC-repaired high-strength concrete (HSC, $f_c = 61.4\text{ MPa}$) composite specimens under up to 175 harsh wet-dry cycles in 10 wt% sodium sulfate solution.
- Evaluates direct tensile pull-off bond strength (initial 2.33 MPa) and slant shear bond strength (initial 31.8 MPa) with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) strain mapping.
- Uncovers the two-stage sulfate degradation mechanism: initial pore densification (+4.7 % shear strength at 50 cycles due to continuous geopolymerization), followed by gradual decalcification and ettringite micro-cracking causing an 18.4 % pull-off and 19.6 % slant shear strength decline at 175 cycles.
- Confirms via SEM-EDS and FT-IR that dense N-A-S-H/C-A-S-H hybrid gels at the interface maintain chemical bond integrity far superior to Portland cement repair materials.
Evidence summary
- Material Matrix: GGBS (529 kg/m³) + Fly Ash (529 kg/m³) + Silica Fume (132 kg/m³) activated with liquid $\text{Na}_2\text{SiO}_3 + \text{NaOH}$, river sand ($S/B = 0.44$), $w/b = 0.32$.
- Fiber Reinforcement: 1.50 vol. % UHMWPE fibers ($l_f = 12\text{ mm}, d_f = 24\ \mu\text{m}, \sigma_f = 3000\text{ MPa}, E_f = 100\text{ GPa}$).
- Mechanical Properties:
- Compressive strength: 60.58 MPa (EGC) vs. 61.43 MPa (substrate HSC).
- Direct tensile strain capacity ($\epsilon_u$): $8.0\%\text{ with }66\text{ saturated microcracks}$.
- Ultimate tensile strength ($\sigma_u$): 5.49 MPa; Average crack width: $96\ \mu\text{m}$.
- Interfacial Bond & Sulfate Durability (175 Wet-Dry Cycles):
- Water control: Tensile bond strength dropped only 5.6 % (from 2.33 to 2.20 MPa).
- 10 % $\text{Na}_2\text{SO}_4$ solution: Tensile bond strength dropped 18.4 % (to 1.90 MPa); Slant shear strength dropped 19.6 % (from 31.8 to 25.6 MPa).
- DIC strain mapping confirmed ductile shear stress redistribution along the grooved interface without brittle debonding.
Linked Atlas nodes
02_concepts/strain_hardening_criteria.md04_material_systems/geopolymer_ecc.md04_material_systems/green_ecc.md04_material_systems/pe_ecc.md05_experiments/direct_tensile_test.md05_experiments/slant_shear_test.md02_concepts/circular_economy_materials.md
Relationship to Victor Li book
- Extends Victor Li (2019) Chapter 10 (Long-Term Durability under Chemical Attack) and Chapter 11 (Infrastructure Repair and Retrofit, pp. 307–335).
- Proves that replacing cement-based repair overlays with zero-clinker PE-EGC eliminates interfacial shear distress caused by substrate-overlay shrinkage mismatch and prevents sulfate-induced delamination spalling.
Claim-evidence rows to add
| Atlas node | Claim | Evidence summary | Page/Figure/Table | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
04_material_systems/geopolymer_ecc.md |
Ternary GGBS-FA-SF geopolymer composite with 1.5 vol. % PE fibers achieves tensile ductility of ~8.0 % and compressive strength $> 60\text{ MPa}$ | Uniaxial tensile dogbone testing and ASTM C109 cube compression testing | Section 2.1 & 3.1, Fig. 3-5, Table 1 | verified_from_pdf |
05_experiments/slant_shear_test.md |
EGC-repaired concrete maintains high slant shear bond strength ($> 25\text{ MPa}$) after 175 aggressive sulfate wet-dry cycles | ASTM C882 slant shear testing and direct pull-off bond testing under 10 % $\text{Na}_2\text{SO}_4$ WD exposure | Section 3.3 & 3.4, Fig. 8-12, Table 4 | verified_from_pdf |
Verification status
- PDF preserved: yes (
kan-2025-engineered-geopolymer-composites-for-concrete.pdf) - Text extracted: yes (
full_text/kan-2025-engineered-geopolymer-composites-for-concrete_full_text.md) - DOI verified: yes (
10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114323) - Metadata verified: yes (J. Build. Eng., Vol. 114, 114323, 2025)
- Claim-evidence matrix ready: yes
Cautions
- Beyond 125 sulfate wet-dry cycles, secondary ettringite expansion and matrix decalcification initiate microcracking at the substrate transition zone; long-term durability designs must account for ~20 % bond strength reduction.
- Requires mechanical interface grooving to maximize physical shear interlock between new EGC and aged concrete.